| Summary: | Clarify "frombranch" flag in overdue_notices.pl | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Koha | Reporter: | Andrew Fuerste-Henry <andrew> |
| Component: | Command-line Utilities | Assignee: | Bugs List <koha-bugs> |
| Status: | RESOLVED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | Testopia <testopia> |
| Severity: | normal | ||
| Priority: | P5 - low | CC: | caroline.cyr-la-rose, lucas, nick, robin |
| Version: | Main | Keywords: | Academy |
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | All | ||
| See Also: | https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=28549 | ||
| GIT URL: | Initiative type: | --- | |
| Sponsorship status: | --- | Comma delimited list of Sponsors: | |
| Crowdfunding goal: | 0 | Patch complexity: | --- |
| Documentation contact: | Documentation submission: | ||
| Text to go in the release notes: | Version(s) released in: | ||
| Circulation function: | |||
|
Description
Andrew Fuerste-Henry
2021-06-10 15:04:20 UTC
Is this still valid? This is what I see in the script or when running with --help
--frombranch Organize and send overdue notices by home library (item-homebranch) or checkout library (item-issuebranch) or patron home library (patron-homebranch).
This option is only used, if the OverdueNoticeFrom system preference is set to 'command-line option'.
Defaults to item-issuebranch.
and then lower down
--frombranch
Organize overdue notices either by checkout library
(item-issuebranch) or item home library (item-homebranch) or
patron home library (patron-homebranch). This option is only
used if the OverdueNoticeFrom system preference is set to use
'command-line option'. Defaults to checkout library
(item-issuebranch).
This setting affects which branch is considered the "source" of
the notice, which in turn affects various aspects of the notice,
including the content, branding, and from email address.
Maybe the help text was revised when the patron-homebranch option was added?
Ah no, it seems Martin reviewed the documentation in bug 39887. I think we can mark this one as resolved duplicate, what do you think Andrew? (In reply to Caroline Cyr La Rose from comment #2) > Ah no, it seems Martin reviewed the documentation in bug 39887. I think we > can mark this one as resolved duplicate, what do you think Andrew? Doing so now. Thanks for catching it! *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 39887 *** |