| Summary: | Should an edited circulation message be re-displayed for the patron? | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Koha | Reporter: | Martin Renvoize (ashimema) <martin.renvoize> |
| Component: | Patrons | Assignee: | Bugs List <koha-bugs> |
| Status: | NEW --- | QA Contact: | Testopia <testopia> |
| Severity: | enhancement | ||
| Priority: | P5 - low | CC: | gmcharlt, kyle, magnus |
| Version: | Main | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | All | ||
| GIT URL: | Initiative type: | --- | |
| Sponsorship status: | --- | Comma delimited list of Sponsors: | |
| Crowdfunding goal: | 0 | Patch complexity: | --- |
| Documentation contact: | Documentation submission: | ||
| Text to go in the release notes: | Version(s) released in: | ||
| Circulation function: | |||
| Bug Depends on: | 21699 | ||
| Bug Blocks: | |||
|
Description
Martin Renvoize (ashimema)
2023-12-21 11:30:39 UTC
Sounds like an edited message should be treated as if it was a new message. I agree, an edited message should remove the patron_read_date information. Ideally it would have some indicator that the message had been edited but do we store that information? |