Summary: | Should an edited circulation message be re-displayed for the patron? | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Koha | Reporter: | Martin Renvoize (ashimema) <martin.renvoize> |
Component: | Patrons | Assignee: | Bugs List <koha-bugs> |
Status: | NEW --- | QA Contact: | Testopia <testopia> |
Severity: | enhancement | ||
Priority: | P5 - low | CC: | gmcharlt, kyle.m.hall, magnus |
Version: | Main | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | All | ||
Change sponsored?: | --- | Patch complexity: | --- |
Documentation contact: | Documentation submission: | ||
Text to go in the release notes: | Version(s) released in: | ||
Circulation function: | |||
Bug Depends on: | 21699 | ||
Bug Blocks: |
Description
Martin Renvoize (ashimema)
2023-12-21 11:30:39 UTC
Sounds like an edited message should be treated as if it was a new message. I agree, an edited message should remove the patron_read_date information. Ideally it would have some indicator that the message had been edited but do we store that information? |