| Summary: | In record editor control fields have a strange label '00' | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Koha | Reporter: | Janusz Kaczmarek <januszop> |
| Component: | Cataloging | Assignee: | Bugs List <koha-bugs> |
| Status: | RESOLVED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | Janusz Kaczmarek <januszop> |
| Severity: | trivial | ||
| Priority: | P5 - low | CC: | m.de.rooy, phil |
| Version: | unspecified | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | All | ||
| GIT URL: | Initiative type: | --- | |
| Sponsorship status: | --- | Comma delimited list of Sponsors: | |
| Crowdfunding goal: | 0 | Patch complexity: | Trivial patch |
| Documentation contact: | Documentation submission: | ||
| Text to go in the release notes: | Version(s) released in: | ||
| Circulation function: | |||
| Attachments: | Bug 39476: In record editor control fields have a strange label '00' | ||
|
Description
Janusz Kaczmarek
2025-03-27 21:33:42 UTC
Created attachment 179816 [details] [review] Bug 39476: In record editor control fields have a strange label '00' In standard record editors both for bibliographic and authority records, the control fields have a strange label '00'. The code author's intention was apparently to hide them ([% IF ( subfield_loo.fixedfield ) %]display:none; [% END %]) but the fixedfield attribute is wrongly prefixed. Test plan: ========== 1. Open a bibliographic record in the standard editor. Note the misleading '00' labels in front of the 00X fields. Do the same for a authority record. 2. Aply the patch ; restart_all. 3. Repeat p. 1. There should not be the '00' labels any more. Sponsored-by: Pontificia Università di San Tommaso d'Aquino (Angelicum) Weird coincidence that this has been broken since forever, and we got two patches for it in two weeks. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 39321 *** (In reply to Phil Ringnalda from comment #2) > Weird coincidence that this has been broken since forever, and we got two > patches for it in two weeks. No wonder -- it became more visible and annoying for librarians when it was bordered, suggesting a possibility for editing in ver. 24.11.03... Thanks, Phil, for catching the duplication. |