In standard record editors both for bibliographic and authority records, the control fields have a strange label '00'. The code author's intention was apparently to hide them ([% IF ( subfield_loo.fixedfield ) %]display:none; [% END %]) but the fixedfield attribute is wrongly prefixed. (A patch will follow.)
Created attachment 179816 [details] [review] Bug 39476: In record editor control fields have a strange label '00' In standard record editors both for bibliographic and authority records, the control fields have a strange label '00'. The code author's intention was apparently to hide them ([% IF ( subfield_loo.fixedfield ) %]display:none; [% END %]) but the fixedfield attribute is wrongly prefixed. Test plan: ========== 1. Open a bibliographic record in the standard editor. Note the misleading '00' labels in front of the 00X fields. Do the same for a authority record. 2. Aply the patch ; restart_all. 3. Repeat p. 1. There should not be the '00' labels any more. Sponsored-by: Pontificia Università di San Tommaso d'Aquino (Angelicum)
Weird coincidence that this has been broken since forever, and we got two patches for it in two weeks. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 39321 ***
(In reply to Phil Ringnalda from comment #2) > Weird coincidence that this has been broken since forever, and we got two > patches for it in two weeks. No wonder -- it became more visible and annoying for librarians when it was bordered, suggesting a possibility for editing in ver. 24.11.03... Thanks, Phil, for catching the duplication.