Summary: | Unable to search items by location | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Koha | Reporter: | Arthur Suzuki <arthur.suzuki> |
Component: | Staff interface | Assignee: | Arthur Suzuki <arthur.suzuki> |
Status: | Signed Off --- | QA Contact: | Testopia <testopia> |
Severity: | normal | ||
Priority: | P5 - low | CC: | gmcharlt, mathsabypro |
Version: | Main | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | All | ||
GIT URL: | Change sponsored?: | --- | |
Patch complexity: | Trivial patch | Documentation contact: | |
Documentation submission: | Text to go in the release notes: | ||
Version(s) released in: | Circulation function: | ||
Bug Depends on: | 15461, 39011 | ||
Bug Blocks: | |||
Attachments: |
Bug 40904: Fix item search by shelving location on catalogue/details.pl
Bug 40904: Fix item search by shelving location on catalogue/details.pl |
Description
Arthur Suzuki
2025-09-30 09:02:43 UTC
Created attachment 187076 [details] [review] Bug 40904: Fix item search by shelving location on catalogue/details.pl Test plan : - before patch on ktd, go to http://localhost:8081/cgi-bin/koha/catalogue/detail.pl?biblionumber=155 - in the holdings table search for "general" like "General Stacks". - see that no items appear - apply patch - repeat the search - all items appear now. Created attachment 187095 [details] [review] Bug 40904: Fix item search by shelving location on catalogue/details.pl Test plan : - before patch on ktd, go to http://localhost:8081/cgi-bin/koha/catalogue/detail.pl?biblionumber=155 - in the holdings table search for "general" like "General Stacks". - see that no items appear - apply patch - repeat the search - all items appear now. Signed-off-by: Mathieu <mathsabypro@gmail.com> BZ 39011 was categorized as a bug fix and not an enhancement. I think the same should apply to this ticket. I tested it on a sandbox, it works, you can search for "general stacks" or "general." "Stacks" doesn't return any results, which may seem surprising, but that's how the filter already works for libraries and statuses following 39011, so that makes sense... But is this the desired behavior for this table or something that should be improved in subsequent bugs? By the way I discovered an other issue while testing : https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=40907 |