| Summary: | Empty Organisation(s) field for organisational patrons | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Koha | Reporter: | Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer> |
| Component: | Templates | Assignee: | Owen Leonard <oleonard> |
| Status: | CLOSED FIXED | QA Contact: | Bugs List <koha-bugs> |
| Severity: | minor | ||
| Priority: | P5 - low | CC: | jwagner, mjr |
| Version: | Main | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | All | ||
| URL: | /cgi-bin/koha/members/memberentry.pl?op=modify&borrowernumber=1159&category_type=I | ||
| Change sponsored?: | --- | Patch complexity: | --- |
| Documentation contact: | Documentation submission: | ||
| Text to go in the release notes: | Version(s) released in: | ||
| Circulation function: | |||
| Bug Depends on: | 6712 | ||
| Bug Blocks: | 7207 | ||
| Attachments: | screenshot | ||
*** Bug 5664 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Display problem fixed by patch for bug 6712 - underlying feature is currently broken and waits for reimplementation. How should it work? Is this about having patrons grouped into organisations grouped into institutions, or is it about having patrons grouped into institutions grouped into a hierarchy of organisations? How was it broken? Just by not feeding the organisations to the template? As bug 6712 hid the feature, I'm not sure that I can test it easily. If the display problem is fixed, isn't this bug fixed? If there is functionality which hasn't been implemented that belongs in another bug. |
Created attachment 4930 [details] screenshot When adding or modifying a patron with a patron category that is type 'organisation' an additioanl fieldset 'Organisation' with an empty field 'Organisation(s)' is displayed in the patron record. I see no way to make use of this. I linked a professional patron to my organisation, but the field stayed empty. I tried adding a second organisation, but the field still stayed empty. There is currently no way to link orgaisational patrons together in hierarchies - so why should we display a list of organisations there? Perhaps this is a leftover from an earlier feature. As it seems not to be working it should be removed. And if there is a trick to make it work it should be documented.