We should replace the use of DBI in C4::Tags with DBIC instead.
Created attachment 29860 [details] [review] Bug 12610 - Replace use of DBI in C4::Tags with DBIx::Class Test Plan: 1) Apply this patch 2) prove t/db_dependent/Tags.t 3) Note all unit tests pass
Created attachment 29861 [details] [review] Bug 12610 - Replace use of DBI in C4::Tags with DBIx::Class Test Plan: 1) Apply this patch 2) prove t/db_dependent/Tags.t 3) Note all unit tests pass
Created attachment 29862 [details] [review] Bug 12610 - Replace use of DBI in C4::Tags with DBIx::Class Test Plan: 1) Apply this patch 2) prove t/db_dependent/Tags.t 3) Note all unit tests pass
Created attachment 29863 [details] [review] Bug 12610 - Replace use of DBI in C4::Tags with DBIx::Class Test Plan: 1) Apply this patch 2) prove t/db_dependent/Tags.t 3) Note all unit tests pass
(In reply to Kyle M Hall from comment #4) > 3) Note all unit tests pass It would have work if t/db_dependent/Tags.t covered all subroutines from C4::Tags. It is not the case at all, only stratify_tags is covered. Would it be possible to add some unit tests to this file to prove all your changes don't introduce regression?
I don't have time to continue working on this patch.