Bug 12610 - Replace use of DBI in C4::Tags with DBIx::Class
Summary: Replace use of DBI in C4::Tags with DBIx::Class
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: Koha
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Architecture, internals, and plumbing (show other bugs)
Version: Main
Hardware: All All
: P5 - low enhancement
Assignee: Galen Charlton
QA Contact: Testopia
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks: 12608
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2014-07-18 16:38 UTC by Kyle M Hall (khall)
Modified: 2017-06-14 22:10 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Change sponsored?: ---
Patch complexity: ---
Documentation contact:
Documentation submission:
Text to go in the release notes:
Version(s) released in:
Circulation function:


Attachments
Bug 12610 - Replace use of DBI in C4::Tags with DBIx::Class (14.62 KB, patch)
2014-07-18 16:39 UTC, Kyle M Hall (khall)
Details | Diff | Splinter Review
Bug 12610 - Replace use of DBI in C4::Tags with DBIx::Class (14.59 KB, patch)
2014-07-18 16:46 UTC, Kyle M Hall (khall)
Details | Diff | Splinter Review
Bug 12610 - Replace use of DBI in C4::Tags with DBIx::Class (14.59 KB, patch)
2014-07-18 16:51 UTC, Kyle M Hall (khall)
Details | Diff | Splinter Review
Bug 12610 - Replace use of DBI in C4::Tags with DBIx::Class (14.84 KB, patch)
2014-07-18 17:05 UTC, Kyle M Hall (khall)
Details | Diff | Splinter Review

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Kyle M Hall (khall) 2014-07-18 16:38:00 UTC
We should replace the use of DBI in C4::Tags with DBIC instead.
Comment 1 Kyle M Hall (khall) 2014-07-18 16:39:17 UTC Comment hidden (obsolete)
Comment 2 Kyle M Hall (khall) 2014-07-18 16:46:09 UTC Comment hidden (obsolete)
Comment 3 Kyle M Hall (khall) 2014-07-18 16:51:06 UTC Comment hidden (obsolete)
Comment 4 Kyle M Hall (khall) 2014-07-18 17:05:01 UTC
Created attachment 29863 [details] [review]
Bug 12610 - Replace use of DBI in C4::Tags with DBIx::Class

Test Plan:
1) Apply this patch
2) prove t/db_dependent/Tags.t
3) Note all unit tests pass
Comment 5 Jonathan Druart 2014-08-29 14:05:43 UTC
(In reply to Kyle M Hall from comment #4)

> 3) Note all unit tests pass

It would have work if t/db_dependent/Tags.t covered all subroutines from C4::Tags.
It is not the case at all, only stratify_tags is covered.
Would it be possible to add some unit tests to this file to prove all your changes don't introduce regression?
Comment 6 Kyle M Hall (khall) 2016-08-23 16:44:11 UTC
I don't have time to continue working on this patch.