Bug 16663 - Add the possibility to search in multiple branches (libraries) or groups in the advanced search in the opac and the staff interface
Summary: Add the possibility to search in multiple branches (libraries) or groups in t...
Status: NEW
Alias: None
Product: Koha
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Searching (show other bugs)
Version: Main
Hardware: All All
: P5 - low enhancement (vote)
Assignee: Galen Charlton
QA Contact: Testopia
URL:
Keywords:
: 16659 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2016-06-04 08:58 UTC by Gaetan Boisson
Modified: 2016-06-04 08:59 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Change sponsored?: ---
Patch complexity: ---
Documentation contact:
Documentation submission:
Text to go in the release notes:
Version(s) released in:


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Gaetan Boisson 2016-06-04 08:58:00 UTC
At the moment, in advanced search it is possible to pre-select a library to filter results on. However we can only select one library at a time.
This patch will allow users to select multiple libraries.

It would be consistent with the current interface to add this feature as a tab, next to item types, locations, and collection codes, with multiple checkboxes.
It should be possible to use "branches" as a value in the AdvancedSearchTypes systempreference.

While we need to keep the feature of searching a group of libraries, if we make it possible to check libraries in the first part of the form and keep the dropdown menu, conflicts will arise between choices made in the two parts of the form.

For this reason the dropdown menu will be removed, and library groups will appear along libraries in the checkboxes.

Right now, the interface groups "location and availability" under the same title. We will only keep availability as a checkbox here.

In advanced search if the searchmylibraryfirst system preference is activated, the library of the logged in patron is preselected in the dropdown menu. We need to keep the functionality by checking the appropriate box in the new form.
Comment 1 Gaetan Boisson 2016-06-04 08:59:07 UTC
*** Bug 16659 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***