Bug 16797 - errors in UNIMARC complet sample authorities
Summary: errors in UNIMARC complet sample authorities
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Koha
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Installation and upgrade (web-based installer) (show other bugs)
Version: Main
Hardware: All All
: P5 - low minor (vote)
Assignee: Fridolin Somers
QA Contact: Testopia
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on: 11586 16554
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2016-06-22 07:45 UTC by Fridolin Somers
Modified: 2023-09-09 21:28 UTC (History)
10 users (show)

See Also:
Change sponsored?: ---
Patch complexity: Small patch
Documentation contact:
Documentation submission:
Text to go in the release notes:
Version(s) released in:


Attachments
Bug 16797 - errors in UNIMARC complet sample authorities (341.49 KB, patch)
2016-06-22 12:01 UTC, Fridolin Somers
Details | Diff | Splinter Review
Bug 16797 - errors in UNIMARC complet sample authorities (221.08 KB, patch)
2016-06-24 08:56 UTC, Fridolin Somers
Details | Diff | Splinter Review
Bug 16797 - errors in UNIMARC complet sample authorities (83.54 KB, patch)
2016-10-14 10:42 UTC, Fridolin Somers
Details | Diff | Splinter Review
Bug 16797 - errors in UNIMARC complet sample authorities (83.60 KB, patch)
2017-07-28 14:16 UTC, Biblibre Sandboxes
Details | Diff | Splinter Review

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Fridolin Somers 2016-06-22 07:45:10 UTC
The SQL UNIMARC complet sample authorities fails : installer/data/mysql/fr-FR/marcflavour/unimarc_complet/Obligatoire/autorites_norme_unimarc.sql

Some lines of auth_subfield_structure use an authtypecode not existing in lines of authtypecode : AUTTIT and FA
Comment 1 Fridolin Somers 2016-06-22 12:01:17 UTC Comment hidden (obsolete)
Comment 2 Mark Tompsett 2016-06-23 15:07:13 UTC
Feedback: Let's start positive.

Nice clean up on the FAM 520 a missing accent.

However...
1) Where is FAM 220 j? FA didn't have it, but pre-existing FAM did.
2) Why were the FAM 420/520 x-z descriptions & values replaced with the FA ones? How did you decide which were correct?

If you can explain these, I'll sign off.
Comment 3 Fridolin Somers 2016-06-24 08:08:14 UTC
(In reply to M. Tompsett from comment #2)
Do you think I should not have merged FAM and FA ?
Comment 4 Fridolin Somers 2016-06-24 08:56:37 UTC
Created attachment 52780 [details] [review]
Bug 16797 - errors in UNIMARC complet sample authorities

The SQL UNIMARC complet sample authorities fails : installer/data/mysql/fr-FR/marcflavour/unimarc_complet/Obligatoire/autorites_norme_unimarc.sql

Some lines of auth_subfield_structure use an authtypecode not existing in lines of authtypecode : AUTTIT, SAUT, SCO and STU.

Test plan :
- On a UNIMARC database :
- clear auth tables :
mysql> delete from auth_subfield_structure;
mysql> delete from auth_tag_structure;
mysql> delete from auth_types;
- import sql file :
mysql < installer/data/mysql/fr-FR/marcflavour/unimarc_complet/Obligatoire/autorites_norme_unimarc.sql
=> Without patch you get error :
ERROR 1452 (23000) at line 1132: Cannot add or update a child row: a foreign key constraint fails (`koha`.`auth_subfield_structure`, CONSTRAINT `auth_subfield_structure_ibfk_1` FOREIGN KEY (`authtypecode`) REFERENCES `auth_types` (`authtypecode`) ON DELETE CASCADE ON UPDATE CASCADE)
=> With patch no errors :
> select distinct(authtypecode) from auth_subfield_structure;
+--------------+
| authtypecode |
+--------------+
|              |
| CO           |
| CO_UNI_TI    |
| FAM          |
| GENRE/FORM   |
| NAME_COL     |
| NP           |
| PA           |
| SAUTTIT      |
| SNC          |
| SNG          |
| TM           |
| TU           |
+--------------+
13 rows in set (0.00 sec)
Comment 5 Fridolin Somers 2016-06-24 08:57:22 UTC
I have removed from patch the FA/FAM part.
I will provide a followup
Comment 6 Fridolin Somers 2016-06-24 08:58:22 UTC
Field 220 :

('FAM', '220', '3', 'Identification autorité', '', 0, 0, -1, '', '', NULL, 0, 0, 0, '', '', '');
('FAM', '220', '7', 'Écriture de catalogage et écriture de la racine de la vedette', '', 0, 0, -1, '', '', NULL, 0, 0, 0, NULL, '', '');
('FAM', '220', '8', 'Langue de catalogage et langue de la racine de la vedette', '', 0, 0, -1, '', '', NULL, 0, 0, 0, NULL, '', '');
('FAM', '220', 'a', 'Elément d''entrée', '', 0, 0, 0, '', '', NULL, 0, 0, 0, NULL, '', '');
('FAM', '220', 'f', 'Dates', '', 0, 0, 0, '', '', NULL, 0, 0, 0, NULL, '', '');
('FAM', '220', 'j', 'Subdivision de forme', '', 1, 0, 0, '', '', NULL, 0, 0, 0, NULL, '', '');
('FAM', '220', 'x', 'Subdivision de sujet', '', 1, 0, 0, '', '', NULL, 0, 0, 0, NULL, '', '');
('FAM', '220', 'y', 'Subdivision géographique', '', 1, 0, 0, '', '', NULL, 0, 0, 0, NULL, '', '');
('FAM', '220', 'z', 'Subdivision chronologique', '', 1, 0, 0, '', '', NULL, 0, 0, 0, NULL, '', '');

('FA', '220', 'a', 'Elément d''entrée', '', 0, 0, 0, '', '', NULL, 0, 0, 0, '', '', '');
('FA', '220', 'f', 'Dates', '', 0, 0, 0, '', '', NULL, 0, 0, 0, NULL, '', '');
('FA', '220', 'x', 'Subdivision de sujet', '', 0, 0, 0, '', '', NULL, 0, 0, 0, NULL, '', '');
('FA', '220', 'y', 'Subdivision géographique', '', 0, 0, 0, '', '', NULL, 0, 0, 0, NULL, '', '');
('FA', '220', 'z', 'Subdivision chronologique', '', 0, 0, 0, '', '', NULL, 0, 0, 0, NULL, '', '');

I think we can use everything from FAM lines.
Comment 7 Fridolin Somers 2016-06-24 09:03:52 UTC
('FAM', '420', 'a', 'Elément d''entrée', '', 0, 0, 0, '', '', NULL, 0, 0, 0, '', '', '');
('FAM', '420', 'f', 'Dates', '', 0, 0, 0, '', '', NULL, 0, 0, 0, NULL, '', '');
('FAM', '420', 'j', 'Subdivision de forme', '', 0, 0, 0, '', '', NULL, 0, 0, 0, NULL, '', '');
('FAM', '420', 'x', 'Subdivision de sujet', '', 0, 0, 0, '', '', NULL, 0, 0, 0, NULL, '', '');
('FAM', '420', 'y', 'Subdivision géographique', '', 0, 0, 0, '', '', NULL, 0, 0, 0, NULL, '', '');
('FAM', '420', 'z', 'Subdivision chronologique', '', 0, 0, 0, '', '', NULL, 0, 0, 0, NULL, '', '');

('FA', '420', '0', 'Formule introductive', '', 0, 0, -1, '', '', '', NULL, 0, 0, NULL, '', NULL);
('FA', '420', '2', 'Code du système d''indexation matière', '', 0, 0, -1, '', '', '', NULL, 0, 0, NULL, '', NULL);
('FA', '420', '3', 'Identificateur de la notice d''autorité', '', 0, 0, -1, '', '', '', NULL, 0, 0, NULL, '', NULL);
('FA', '420', '5', 'Données codées relatives aux mentions de formes rejetées ou  associées    0', '', 0, 0, -1, '', '', '', NULL, 0, 0, NULL, '', NULL);
('FA', '420', '6', 'Données de lien entre zones', '', 0, 0, -1, '', '', '', NULL, 0, 0, NULL, '', NULL);
('FA', '420', '7', 'Ecriture de catalogage et écriture de la racine de la vedette', '', 0, 0, -1, '', '', '', NULL, 0, 0, NULL, '', NULL);
('FA', '420', '8', 'Langue de catalogage et langue de la racine de la vedette', '', 0, 0, -1, '', '', '', NULL, 0, 0, NULL, '', NULL);
('FA', '420', 'a', 'Elément d''entrée', '', 0, 0, 0, '', '', '', NULL, 0, 0, NULL, '', NULL);
('FA', '420', 'j', 'Subdivision de forme', '', 1, 0, -1, '', '', '', NULL, 0, 0, NULL, '', NULL);
('FA', '420', 'x', 'Subdiv. de sujet', '', 1, 0, 0, '', '', '', NULL, 0, 0, NULL, '', NULL);
('FA', '420', 'y', 'Subdiv. géographique', '', 1, 0, 0, '', '', '', NULL, 0, 0, NULL, '', NULL);
('FA', '420', 'z', 'Subdiv. chronologique', '', 1, 0, 0, '', '', '', NULL, 0, 0, NULL, '', NULL);

I think we can use all line from FA and 420$f from FAM, not repeatable like 220$f.

Last value should be '' instead of NULL, its the column default value.
Comment 8 Fridolin Somers 2016-06-24 09:24:53 UTC
('FAM', '520', '5', 'Type de lien', '', 0, 0, 0, '', '', NULL, 0, 0, 0, '', '', '');
('FAM', '520', '9', 'Numéro autorité koha', '', 0, 0, 0, '', '', NULL, 0, 0, 0, NULL, '', '');
('FAM', '520', 'a', 'Element d''entrée', '', 0, 0, 0, '', '', NULL, 0, 0, 0, NULL, 'FAM', '');
('FAM', '520', 'f', 'Dates', '', 0, 0, 0, '', '', NULL, 0, 0, 0, NULL, '', '');
('FAM', '520', 'j', 'Subdivision de forme', '', 1, 0, 0, '', '', NULL, 0, 0, 0, NULL, '', '');
('FAM', '520', 'x', 'Subdivision de sujet', '', 1, 0, 0, '', '', NULL, 0, 0, 0, NULL, '', '');
('FAM', '520', 'y', 'Subdivision géographique', '', 1, 0, 0, '', '', NULL, 0, 0, 0, NULL, '', '');
('FAM', '520', 'z', 'Subdivision chronologique', '', 1, 0, 0, '', '', NULL, 0, 0, 0, NULL, '', '');

('FA', '520', '0', 'Formule introductive', '', 0, 0, -1, '', '', NULL, 0, 0, 0, '', '', '');
('FA', '520', '2', 'Code du système d''indexation matière', '', 0, 0, -1, '', '', NULL, 0, 0, 0, NULL, '', '');
('FA', '520', '3', 'Identificateur de la notice d''autorité', '', 0, 0, 0, '', '', NULL, 0, 0, 0, NULL, '', '');
('FA', '520', '5', 'Données codées relatives aux mentions de formes rejetées ou  associées    0', '', 0, 0, 0, 'AUT_LIEN', '', NULL, 0, 0, 0, NULL, '', '');
('FA', '520', '6', 'Données de lien entre zones', '', 0, 0, -1, '', '', NULL, 0, 0, 0, NULL, '', '');
('FA', '520', '7', 'Ecriture de catalogage et écriture de la racine de la vedette', '', 0, 0, -1, '', '', NULL, 0, 0, 0, NULL, '', '');
('FA', '520', '8', 'Langue de catalogage et langue de la racine de la vedette', '', 0, 0, -1, '', '', NULL, 0, 0, 0, NULL, '', '');
('FA', '520', '9', 'N° autorité koha', '', 0, 0, 0, '', '', NULL, 0, 0, 0, NULL, '', '');
('FA', '520', 'a', 'Elément d''entrée', '', 0, 0, 0, '', '', NULL, 0, 0, 0, NULL, 'FA', '');
('FA', '520', 'j', 'Subdivision de forme', '', 1, 0, 0, '', '', NULL, 0, 0, 0, NULL, '', '');
('FA', '520', 'x', 'Subdiv. de sujet', '', 1, 0, 0, '', '', NULL, 0, 0, 0, NULL, '', '');
('FA', '520', 'y', 'Subdiv. géographique', '', 1, 0, 0, '', '', NULL, 0, 0, 0, NULL, '', '');
('FA', '520', 'z', 'Subdiv. chronologique', '', 1, 0, 0, '', '', NULL, 0, 0, 0, NULL, '', '');

I think we can use all line from FA and 520$f from FAM, not repeatable like 220$f.

FA 520$a contains 'FA' in frameworkcode, I think this is an error it should be empty.

520$5 as a different description in FA and FAM, Id say use FA like in 420$5.
Comment 9 Fridolin Somers 2016-06-24 09:26:02 UTC
('FAM', '720', 'a', 'Elément d''entrée', '', 0, 0, 0, '', '', NULL, 0, 0, 0, '', '', '');
('FAM', '720', 'f', 'Dates', '', 0, 0, 0, '', '', NULL, 0, 0, 0, NULL, '', '');
('FAM', '720', 'j', 'Subdivision de forme', '', 1, 0, 0, '', '', NULL, 0, 0, 0, NULL, '', '');
('FAM', '720', 'x', 'Subdivision de sujet', '', 1, 0, 0, '', '', NULL, 0, 0, 0, NULL, '', '');
('FAM', '720', 'y', 'Subdivision géographique', '', 1, 0, 0, '', '', NULL, 0, 0, 0, NULL, '', '');
('FAM', '720', 'z', 'Subdivision chronologique', '', 1, 0, 0, '', '', NULL, 0, 0, 0, NULL, '', '');

720 exists only in FAM, use it.
Maybe some subfields are missing, 750 as $2 $3 $8
Comment 10 delaye 2016-06-24 10:11:48 UTC
"I think we can use everything from FAM lines."

Ok

"I think we can use all line from FA and 420$f from FAM, not repeatable like 220$f.

Last value should be '' instead of NULL, its the column default value."

Ok

"I think we can use all line from FA and 520$f from FAM, not repeatable like 220$f.

FA 520$a contains 'FA' in frameworkcode, I think this is an error it should be empty."

Ok

Add if not exists

('FAM', '720', '2', 'Code du système d\'indexation matière', '', 0, 0, 0, '', '', NULL, 0, 0, 0, '', '', '');
('FAM', '720', '3', 'Identificateur de la notice d\'autorité', '', 0, 0, 0, '', '', NULL, 0, 0, 0, NULL, '', '');
('FAM', '720', '7', 'Écriture de catalogage et écriture de la racine de la vedette', '', 1, 0, 0, '', '', NULL, 0, 0, 0, NULL, '', '');
('FAM', '720', '8', 'Langue de catalogage et langue de la racine de la vedette', '', 1, 0, 0, '', '', NULL, 0, 0, 0, NULL, '', '');

and

('FAM', '750', '2', 'Code du système d\'indexation matière', '', 0, 0, 0, '', '', NULL, 0, 0, 0, '', '', '');
('FAM', '720', '3', 'Identificateur de la notice d\'autorité', '', 0, 0, 0, '', '', NULL, 0, 0, 0, NULL, '', '');
('FAM', '750', '7', 'Écriture de catalogage et écriture de la racine de la vedette', '', 1, 0, 0, '', '', NULL, 0, 0, 0, NULL, '', '');
('FAM', '750', '8', 'Langue de catalogage et langue de la racine de la vedette', '', 1, 0, 0, '', '', NULL, 0, 0, 0, NULL, '', '');
('FAM', '750', 'a', 'Elément d''entrée', '', 0, 0, 0, '', '', NULL, 0, 0, 0, '', '', '');
('FAM', '750', 'f', 'Dates', '', 0, 0, 0, '', '', NULL, 0, 0, 0, NULL, '', '');
('FAM', '750', 'j', 'Subdivision de forme', '', 1, 0, 0, '', '', NULL, 0, 0, 0, NULL, '', '');
('FAM', '750', 'x', 'Subdivision de sujet', '', 1, 0, 0, '', '', NULL, 0, 0, 0, NULL, '', '');
('FAM', '750', 'y', 'Subdivision géographique', '', 1, 0, 0, '', '', NULL, 0, 0, 0, NULL, '', '');
('FAM', '750', 'z', 'Subdivision chronologique', '', 1, 0, 0, '', '', NULL, 0, 0, 0, NULL, '', '');
Comment 11 Mark Tompsett 2016-06-24 12:34:21 UTC
(In reply to Fridolin SOMERS from comment #3)
> (In reply to M. Tompsett from comment #2)
> Do you think I should not have merged FAM and FA ?

I have no issue with the merge. It seemed you lost data the 'j' when you did, and wanted to confirm that you really intended to change data when merging (i.e. FA values used over pre-existing FAM ones).
Comment 12 Mark Tompsett 2016-06-24 12:39:32 UTC
(In reply to M. Tompsett from comment #11)
> I have no issue with the merge. It seemed you lost data the 'j' when you
> did,

-- and I should point out that I have no knowledge of UNIMARC. I was just trying to make sense of where data was coming from and where it went when comparing the old and new. For example, if the new version of UNIMARC says no 'j', but the old had one, that's great then.
Comment 13 Fridolin Somers 2016-06-24 13:06:14 UTC
(In reply to M. Tompsett from comment #11)
> (In reply to Fridolin SOMERS from comment #3)
> > (In reply to M. Tompsett from comment #2)
> > Do you think I should not have merged FAM and FA ?
> 
> I have no issue with the merge. It seemed you lost data the 'j' when you
> did, and wanted to confirm that you really intended to change data when
> merging (i.e. FA values used over pre-existing FAM ones).

Yep that was a mistake.
Thanks for testing.

I've ask my collegues to read the comments.
Comment 14 Mark Tompsett 2016-06-24 14:02:18 UTC
(In reply to Fridolin SOMERS from comment #13)
> Thanks for testing.
> I've ask my collegues to read the comments.

Tested the revised patch. This is purely the removal of: AUTTIT, SAUT, SCO and STU. This still has some constraint errors. Awaiting a follow-up for further testing. :)

use kohadata;
delete from auth_subfield_structure;
delete from auth_tag_structure;
delete from auth_types;
source installer/data/mysql/fr-FR/marcflavour/unimarc_complet/Obligatoire/autorites_norme_unimarc.sql;

-- Once you get "two" patches which handle the constraint issues and contain what you believe is correct. Could you add a third which turns all the single inserts into a multi-value insert, at least for the blocks (eg. FA, whatever else...)? Thanks for the efforts. :)
Comment 15 Fridolin Somers 2016-06-27 08:11:34 UTC
(In reply to M. Tompsett from comment #14)
> 
> -- Once you get "two" patches which handle the constraint issues and contain
> what you believe is correct. Could you add a third which turns all the
> single inserts into a multi-value insert, at least for the blocks (eg. FA,
> whatever else...)? Thanks for the efforts. :)

You mean : 
INSERT INTO table
(c1, c2, c3)
VALUES
(1, 'bla', 0),
(2, 'bla', 1);

Does it make a performance difference ?
Comment 16 Mark Tompsett 2016-06-27 12:11:42 UTC
(In reply to Fridolin SOMERS from comment #15)
> Does it make a performance difference ?

No, but it makes a vertical scroll difference when manually testing. Also, it helps keep everything the same. If a new field is introduced, it will force an update to keep consistency, rather than have some with no value and others with a value.
Comment 17 Fridolin Somers 2016-10-14 10:41:08 UTC
I have rebased after Bug 16554 was integrated
Comment 18 Fridolin Somers 2016-10-14 10:42:00 UTC
Created attachment 56505 [details] [review]
Bug 16797 - errors in UNIMARC complet sample authorities

The SQL UNIMARC complet sample authorities fails : installer/data/mysql/fr-FR/marcflavour/unimarc_complet/Obligatoire/autorites_norme_unimarc.sql

Some lines of auth_subfield_structure use an authtypecode not existing in lines of authtypecode : AUTTIT, SAUT, SCO and STU.

Test plan :
- On a UNIMARC database :
- clear auth tables :
mysql> delete from auth_subfield_structure;
mysql> delete from auth_tag_structure;
mysql> delete from auth_types;
- import sql file :
mysql < installer/data/mysql/fr-FR/marcflavour/unimarc_complet/Obligatoire/autorites_norme_unimarc.sql
=> Without patch you get error :
ERROR 1452 (23000) at line 1132: Cannot add or update a child row: a foreign key constraint fails (`koha`.`auth_subfield_structure`, CONSTRAINT `auth_subfield_structure_ibfk_1` FOREIGN KEY (`authtypecode`) REFERENCES `auth_types` (`authtypecode`) ON DELETE CASCADE ON UPDATE CASCADE)
=> With patch no errors :
> select distinct(authtypecode) from auth_subfield_structure;
+--------------+
| authtypecode |
+--------------+
|              |
| CO           |
| CO_UNI_TI    |
| FAM          |
| GENRE/FORM   |
| NAME_COL     |
| NP           |
| PA           |
| SAUTTIT      |
| SNC          |
| SNG          |
| TM           |
| TU           |
+--------------+
13 rows in set (0.00 sec)
- Have a look at authoritie frameworks in Admin
Comment 19 Biblibre Sandboxes 2017-07-28 14:16:11 UTC
Patch tested with a sandbox, by Laurence Rault <laurence.rault@biblibre.com>
Comment 20 Biblibre Sandboxes 2017-07-28 14:16:33 UTC
Created attachment 65315 [details] [review]
Bug 16797 - errors in UNIMARC complet sample authorities

The SQL UNIMARC complet sample authorities fails : installer/data/mysql/fr-FR/marcflavour/unimarc_complet/Obligatoire/autorites_norme_unimarc.sql

Some lines of auth_subfield_structure use an authtypecode not existing in lines of authtypecode : AUTTIT, SAUT, SCO and STU.

Test plan :
- On a UNIMARC database :
- clear auth tables :
mysql> delete from auth_subfield_structure;
mysql> delete from auth_tag_structure;
mysql> delete from auth_types;
- import sql file :
mysql < installer/data/mysql/fr-FR/marcflavour/unimarc_complet/Obligatoire/autorites_norme_unimarc.sql
=> Without patch you get error :
ERROR 1452 (23000) at line 1132: Cannot add or update a child row: a foreign key constraint fails (`koha`.`auth_subfield_structure`, CONSTRAINT `auth_subfield_structure_ibfk_1` FOREIGN KEY (`authtypecode`) REFERENCES `auth_types` (`authtypecode`) ON DELETE CASCADE ON UPDATE CASCADE)
=> With patch no errors :
> select distinct(authtypecode) from auth_subfield_structure;
+--------------+
| authtypecode |
+--------------+
|              |
| CO           |
| CO_UNI_TI    |
| FAM          |
| GENRE/FORM   |
| NAME_COL     |
| NP           |
| PA           |
| SAUTTIT      |
| SNC          |
| SNG          |
| TM           |
| TU           |
+--------------+
13 rows in set (0.00 sec)
- Have a look at authoritie frameworks in Admin

Signed-off-by: Laurence Rault <laurence.rault@biblibre.com>
Comment 21 Laurence Rault 2017-07-28 14:18:01 UTC
tested OK with the patch

but seemed OK as well without : no sql error without the patch
Comment 22 Jonathan Druart 2017-08-10 19:19:17 UTC
Maybe a silly question but why do not you create the authtypecodez AUTTIT, SAUT, SCO and STU instead?
Comment 23 Julian Maurice 2017-09-01 13:24:13 UTC
(In reply to Jonathan Druart from comment #22)
> Maybe a silly question but why do not you create the authtypecodez AUTTIT,
> SAUT, SCO and STU instead?

Changing status to In Discussion to have an answer
Comment 24 Fridolin Somers 2017-09-25 15:37:45 UTC
(In reply to Jonathan Druart from comment #22)
> Maybe a silly question but why do not you create the authtypecodez AUTTIT,
> SAUT, SCO and STU instead?

I bet those codes are obsolete.
Those sample files must provide a small set of frameworks to start with.
One can always create more specific frameworks.
Comment 25 Marcel de Rooy 2017-10-20 09:20:04 UTC
(In reply to Fridolin SOMERS from comment #24)
> (In reply to Jonathan Druart from comment #22)
> > Maybe a silly question but why do not you create the authtypecodez AUTTIT,
> > SAUT, SCO and STU instead?
> 
> I bet those codes are obsolete.
> Those sample files must provide a small set of frameworks to start with.
> One can always create more specific frameworks.

"I bet" is not convincing enough ;) I had the same question when glancing thru your patch.
Please explain. When were these codes added, removed, etc. Did they forget to remove these lines ? Please do some git research to provide further evidence.
Comment 26 Katrin Fischer 2023-09-09 21:28:19 UTC
It looks like this has been resolved since, the .yml files for the UNIMARC installer no longer contain the removed authtypecodes.