Bug 17837 - Correct some authorised values in fr-FR
Summary: Correct some authorised values in fr-FR
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 17809
Alias: None
Product: Koha
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Database (show other bugs)
Version: Main
Hardware: All All
: P5 - low minor
Assignee: Mark Tompsett
QA Contact: Testopia
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on: 17809
Blocks:
  Show dependency tree / graph
 
Reported: 2017-01-03 18:09 UTC by Mark Tompsett
Modified: 2017-01-19 14:47 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Change sponsored?: ---
Patch complexity: Small patch
Documentation contact:
Documentation submission:
Text to go in the release notes:
Version(s) released in:
Circulation function:

Attachments
Bug 17837 correct authorisation values for fr-FR (3.96 KB, patch)
2017-01-03 18:11 UTC, Mark Tompsett 		Details | Diff | Splinter Review
Bug 17837 correct authorisation values for fr-FR (4.01 KB, patch)
2017-01-17 01:51 UTC, Luke Honiss 		Details | Diff | Splinter Review
Show Obsolete (1) View All Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Mark Tompsett 2017-01-03 18:09:39 UTC 
Bug 17809 corrects ER, but missed CC, GQ, and PK.
Remove and edit duplicates and correct typos.
Comment 1 Mark Tompsett 2017-01-03 18:11:30 UTC 
Created attachment 58576 [details] [review]
Bug 17837 correct authorisation values for fr-FR

Bug 17809 corrected ER, but failed to correct:
CC -- duplicate, but name not full.
GQ -- duplicate, but only one name correct.
PK -- Poland was mislabelled.

This removes and edits duplicates and corrects PK to PL.
Comment 2 Luke Honiss 2017-01-17 01:51:19 UTC 
Created attachment 59047 [details] [review]
Bug 17837 correct authorisation values for fr-FR

Bug 17809 corrected ER, but failed to correct:
CC -- duplicate, but name not full.
GQ -- duplicate, but only one name correct.
PK -- Poland was mislabelled.

This removes and edits duplicates and corrects PK to PL.

Signed-off-by: Luke Honiss <luke.honiss@gmail.com>
Comment 3 Jonathan Druart 2017-01-17 11:17:20 UTC 
I think it would be better to move these patches on bug 17809 and provide a single update database entry. What do you think?
Comment 4 Luke Honiss 2017-01-19 06:55:50 UTC 
That would probably be a good idea. It is the same file anyway. This patch was created to address the missed duplicates as well as typos so it may be better to close this one and edit 17809 to include all the changes
Comment 5 Mark Tompsett 2017-01-19 14:47:29 UTC 
As per Jonathan's suggestion in comment #3, I've moved this to bug 17809.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 17809 ***