---- Reported by nengard@gmail.com 2008-06-03 10:28:44 ---- When adding an authority to a bib record the authority doesn't update to show that it's linked to that bib. Per Chat: <nengard> authorities question - i have an authority record for stephen king - i applied it to a book by stephen king and saved the record - how do I get the authority record to show that it's used on 1 biblio? <nengard> it still says 0 biblio <gmcharlt> nengard: should be picked up by indexing <nengard> hmmm - well i think my index has been rebuilt since i did this - but i'll do it on training and see what happens in 6 mnutes :) <nengard> gmcharlt - per the authorities question - i assigned authorities to catalog records on the new training install - and it has rebuilt - but it still says 0 biblios <cfouts> i'll look... <gmcharlt> nengard: sigh - ok, please file a bug <nengard> :( <nengard> wait - rch - is authorities rebuilding on training? <rch> nengard: yes <nengard> bah - okay - filing bug <rch> nengard: checking error logs <nengard> k <rch> nengard: looks like might be a config issue, hold on <nengard> oh goodie <rch> Search biblios ERROR 114 1 1+0 RPN @attrset Bib-1 @attr "1=Koha-Auth-Number" @attr 2=102 1 <nengard> what does that mean? <rch> nengard: which biblios did you add authorities to? <nengard> biblionumber=606 - stephen king <nengard> and <nengard> biblionumber=124 <nengard> - science fiction <rch> so you added to a 700$a ? <rch> for king? <nengard> 700a for stephen king <nengard> and 650 for science fiction <nengard> and on my test it was a 100z for king <nengard> 100a <rch> ok. yeah, no subf 9 on those records. <nengard> subfield 9 where? <nengard> on the authority? or the bi record? and which field? <nengard> the authorities didn't prompt me that i was missing a field and neither did the bib <rch> nengard: when you save the bib, it should store the authority number in subf 9, without your involvement. <nengard> ah <nengard> so it's a bug <rch> nengard: unless you modified the framework, yes. <nengard> okay - i didn't - so i'll report this <nengard> what priority? <rch> nengard: that's a blocker :[ ---- Additional Comments From rch@liblime.com 2008-06-03 11:51:56 ---- Some testing reveals that setting hidden value such that subf 9 is not displayed in the marc editor causes the auth link to be lost. Help for hidden value needs to be updated also, since 'collapsed' doesn't seem to make sense anymore. ---- Additional Comments From gmcharlt@gmail.com 2008-06-24 15:13:12 ---- Patch submitted for this bug - subfield $9 (for headings fields) are now forced to always be present in the bib editor. ---- Additional Comments From jmf@liblime.com 2008-06-25 12:58:15 ---- tested and this is working, thanks Galen! --- Bug imported by chris@bigballofwax.co.nz 2010-05-21 00:47 UTC --- This bug was previously known as _bug_ 2206 at http://bugs.koha.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=2206 Actual time not defined. Setting to 0.0 CC member rch@liblime.com does not have an account here