When ordering from a suggestion, the "Search" field also search the borrowernumber of the users, even if this field is not displayed in the table. It leads to have weird and non relevant results for the user. Shouldn't this search only apply to visible datas ?
Bonjour Séverine, It looks like it is the expected behaviour, from bug 17899 (commit 1104e61635e2d567c89587c28fd9a24b4f262037): - { "aTargets": [ 0 ], "bVisible": false, "bSearchable": false }, + { "aTargets": [ 0 ], "bVisible": false, "bSearchable": true }, // must be searchable for fnFilter
Lowering severity. Frido, what are your thoughts on this?
(In reply to Jonathan Druart from comment #2) > Lowering severity. > > Frido, what are your thoughts on this? Oh indeed, the search by borrowernumber is needed for "Show only mine" filter. I'd say the impact is really minor, close with wontfix ?
(In reply to Fridolin SOMERS from comment #3) > (In reply to Jonathan Druart from comment #2) > > Lowering severity. > > > > Frido, what are your thoughts on this? > > Oh indeed, the search by borrowernumber is needed for "Show only mine" > filter. > > I'd say the impact is really minor, close with wontfix ? No, I do not think so. So answer shows us it is a bug actually :) The searchable flag for the column could be added before clicking the link, then removed.
Your* answer shows us it is a bug actually :)
(In reply to Jonathan Druart from comment #5) > Your* answer shows us it is a bug actually :) Ok, but I don't know how it could be fixed.
If it's too difficult too fix, maybe we could just display borrowernumber between parenthesis ? What bothered me was having some suggsstions displayed after a search without knowing why, because none of the displayed values matched the search.
I do not think displaying the borrowernumber will be consistent with other views. I am sorry but I do not have anything simple to suggest.