Hi There is a problem with suggestions and the System preference UseACQFrameworkForBiblioRecords. When we are adding a suggestion to a basket and the preference is enabled, the publication date written in the suggestion is not imported into the ACQ framework correctly in the acquisitions module. Instead of the date of publication, it is written 0 in field 264 or 260. Test plan: -Create an ACQ MARC bibliographic framework -Create links to marc mapping for the 260$c or 264$c fields. -Enable UseACQFrameworkForBiblioRecords. -Add a suggestion in your basket and make sure there is a publication date in your suggestion. - Notice in that the publication date is 0 in your framework in the acquisition information. Is it a problem from the link to Marc mapping? Or it is a bug with the preference system. It would be nice to keep this information when adding a suggestion to a bascket. Thanks, Patrick.
-Create links to marc mapping for the 260$c or 264$c fields. Which field did you map it to? publicationyear or copyrightdate?
Hello, We have tried with both links and each time the publication date of the suggestion is not importer in the basket for order. Instead of the date, we have the number 0 entered in the field. Thanks, Patrick.
Hi Patrick, I just tested on master with the default ACQ framework and my 260c ended up in copyrightdate correctly as mapped. Can you retest and tell us the exact version you are testing with?
(In reply to Katrin Fischer from comment #3) > Hi Patrick, > I just tested on master with the default ACQ framework and my 260c ended up > in copyrightdate correctly as mapped. Can you retest and tell us the exact > version you are testing with? Hi Katrin, I tested it today with 18.05.03 and i have still the problem. I notice that there is no mapping for publicationyear, is this a problem? There is a mapping for copyrightdate. See attached file. Regards Marjorie
Created attachment 100981 [details] acq_
Created attachment 100982 [details] mapping
Not an enhancement, but more of a bug. Maybe someone else could give it a go in confirming the issue?
+1