Bug 23616 - Private repeatable note field needed in Serials Subscription Record
Summary: Private repeatable note field needed in Serials Subscription Record
Status: NEW
Alias: None
Product: Koha
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Serials (show other bugs)
Version: Main
Hardware: All All
: P5 - low new feature with 1 vote (vote)
Assignee: Bugs List
QA Contact: Testopia
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2019-09-16 11:14 UTC by Niamh
Modified: 2023-04-01 12:10 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

See Also:
Change sponsored?: ---
Patch complexity: ---
Documentation contact:
Documentation submission:
Text to go in the release notes:
Version(s) released in:


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Niamh 2019-09-16 11:14:45 UTC
It is useful to have a record of emails and dates of correspondence in the note field of a journal record in KOHA serials subscriptions. We want to keep this type of note for staff view only while still having the option of a public note also. 

Staff need to see at a glance what and when action is taken when a claim is escalated. When a missing journal eventually arrives and is marked arrived?, 

Currently, the notes in the note field must be deleted, as they will show on the OPAC. So the record of what happened is lost in KOHA serials. It would be useful to have a  repeatable private note field as well as the public one. See: Electrical Times: https://librarysearch.it-tallaght.ie//cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=25354 ? On this record, See the note for July 2018. It is far easier to see what is happening when the notes are in KOHA serials than stored elsewhere. 


Serials - Record: Serials administrators need a repeatable private note field, for administration of the subscription and claiming processes. This field would be attached to the subscription field and would not display on the opac. Serials therefore needs two note fields in subscriptions.  One for public display and a separate repeatable one for non-public display only. This change would also mean that we can change the status of an issue to “missing (not received)” and be able to explain this status further, such as “not published” or “combined with December issue” in the public note, while still being able to use the non public note for recording details in relation to correspondence and actions relating to claiming the missing issue.



These notes are kept to observe patterns in failure to supply, issues with delivery, non-publication etc., so that staff know who was contacted when regarding issues about issues. Processing of serials claims would be more accurate and efficient.  This simple change would allow the serials workflow to stay within the serials module making it more streamlined and efficient.Staff feel that this data does not belong on the marc record.
Loss of information re business relationship and contractual efficiency with supplier. We currently use this note field to record any problems/correspondence in relation to subscriptions. It enables us to spot patterns in non-supply.  

On arrival of an issue we must then delete the notes from this field or they will show to the public.  The history of correspondence/problems will now be lost.  These notes can be useful for tracking ongoing/previous problems.  Having to ensure that notes are deleted before displaying publicly allows for possible human error.

As far as I can see, this is not the same issue as bues 11492 and 23416, but related