We record lost_on and damaged_on. Can we record notforloan_on, too? It'd be helpful for various reports.
I agree, this would be very helpful!
We are also interested in this, particularly to know when items arrive.
+1 - This would be a useful addition for us!
*** Bug 34699 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
This would be particularly useful if notforloan_on contained a date even when notforloan was changed to 0. It would give us a simple way to track when items became available.
+1 Agreed that this would be very helpful!