We record lost_on and damaged_on. Can we record notforloan_on, too? It'd be helpful for various reports.
I agree, this would be very helpful!
We are also interested in this, particularly to know when items arrive.
+1 - This would be a useful addition for us!
*** Bug 34699 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
This would be particularly useful if notforloan_on contained a date even when notforloan was changed to 0. It would give us a simple way to track when items became available.
+1 Agreed that this would be very helpful!
We would love a way to track the amount of time it's taking for us to make new items available to the public after receiving them from our vendors. This bug would help us do that.