Bug 25364 added an "other" option for gender, which is great! But why are the gender options hardcoded to begin with? We allow each install to define their own options for borrower titles. We should do the same for gender (either in a dedicated syspref as we have for title or in an authorized value).
I think one reason was that the authorised values are still not translatable :( Which means it makes it really hard to work this out for multi-language installation to always display nicely.
(In reply to Katrin Fischer from comment #1) > I think one reason was that the authorised values are still not translatable Do we have a bug open for that? I imagine that the way to fix that would be to add a locale column? Initially we could default to English but build up support for passing in locales.
(In reply to David Cook from comment #2) > (In reply to Katrin Fischer from comment #1) > > I think one reason was that the authorised values are still not translatable > > Do we have a bug open for that? > > I imagine that the way to fix that would be to add a locale column? > Initially we could default to English but build up support for passing in > locales. bug 20307
(In reply to Katrin Fischer from comment #3) > (In reply to David Cook from comment #2) > > (In reply to Katrin Fischer from comment #1) > > > I think one reason was that the authorised values are still not translatable > > > > Do we have a bug open for that? > > > > I imagine that the way to fix that would be to add a locale column? > > Initially we could default to English but build up support for passing in > > locales. > > bug 20307 Yikes bug 20307 and bug 24975 look a bit stuck.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 23609 ***