From bug 26048 comment 19: """ Yesterday I was thinking we could have a syspref to display/hide the error (not the stacktrace). Or enable it by default for superlibrarian. What do you think (on its own bug report of course)? """ From bug 26048 comment 30: """ But in most production situations I don't think that we'd want to show system generated error messages. It's not a good look. """
I'd like to see this. We could add a syspref in Logs > Debugging
Created attachment 118293 [details] [review] Bug 27557: Display stacktrace on 500 for superlibrarian From pod for Plack::Middleware::StackTrace: """ Gathering the information for a stack trace via Devel::StackTrace is slow, and Devel::StackTrace::WithLexicals is significantly slower still. This is not usually a concern in development and when exceptions are rare. However, your application may include code that's throwing and catching exceptions that you're not aware of. Such code will run significantly slower with this module. """ Maybe we should avoid the stacktrace and prefer to retrieve the error only, without the stacktrace? (but how?) cp C4/Auth.pm /usr/share/koha/lib/C4/Auth.pm cp debian/templates/plack.psgi /etc/koha/sites/kohadev/plack.psgi cp errors/500.pl /usr/share/koha/intranet/cgi-bin/errors/500.pl cp koha-tmpl/intranet-tmpl/prog/en/modules/errors/errorpage.tt /usr/share/koha/intranet/htdocs/intranet-tmpl/prog/en/modules/errors/errorpage.tt restart_all
Any ideas how we could retrieve the original error (vs the whole stacktrace)?
(In reply to Jonathan Druart from comment #3) > Any ideas how we could retrieve the original error (vs the whole stacktrace)? Based on my comment from https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=26048#c29, I think we would need to replace Plack::Middleware::HTTPException with our own custom error handling middleware. Looking at the patch here, I would remind folk that the StackTrace middleware is only recommended for development and not production: "You're recommended to use this middleware during the development and use Plack::Middleware::HTTPExceptions in the deployment mode as a replacement" (https://metacpan.org/pod/Plack::Middleware::StackTrace). But the concept used by StackTrace (ie $env->{'plack.stacktrace.text'} = $text;) is what I would suggest. Ultimately, write a middleware that catches the error using eval{} or try/catch, save the error to an environmental variable, print the error to psgi.errors, and then move on to the ErrorDocument middleware.
It would also be nice if we could give more librarian-centric error messages that aren't behind a syspref. For example, errors triggered by a bib or item missing a field assumed to always have a value ( itype, I'm looking at you ).
Looking at this again and wouldn't the best solution be to improve our coding practices to gracefully handle errors in context-specific situations?
(In reply to David Cook from comment #6) > Looking at this again and wouldn't the best solution be to improve our > coding practices to gracefully handle errors in context-specific situations? Yes, and being able to get those errors from librarians would make finding and handling those errors much easier. I wish we had some real world examples. To continue off my itype example, there are times we can know ahead of time that an unpopulated itype will trigger and error, and times we may not know. We can probably use transactions to more gracefully handle unknowns at the cost of performance. What may be a good solution halfway between giving user's entire stack traces and giving them a generic 500 error would be something along the lines of what CloudFlare does where the user is present an id ( named Ray ID in the case of CloudFlare ) and we can store the full stack trace in the database with the corresponding ID. That way the librarian or patron can make a report with the ID to the library IT staff or support organization.
(In reply to Kyle M Hall (khall) from comment #7) > What may be a good solution halfway between giving user's entire stack > traces and giving them a generic 500 error would be something along the > lines of what CloudFlare does where the user is present an id ( named Ray ID > in the case of CloudFlare ) and we can store the full stack trace in the > database with the corresponding ID. That way the librarian or patron can > make a report with the ID to the library IT staff or support organization. That's pretty compelling. I like that.