Our worker does not fork to run tasks, so if a task explodes, the worker it brought down with it... that is bad.
(In reply to Martin Renvoize from comment #0) > Our worker does not fork to run tasks, so if a task explodes, the worker it > brought down with it... that is bad. Agreed. It should be forking. Even if we wrapped the processing in an eval{}, we should still be forking from a memory efficiency perspective.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 27756 ***