Bug 28164 - Sorting on POS register details transactions table is not working right
Summary: Sorting on POS register details transactions table is not working right
Status: NEW
Alias: None
Product: Koha
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Fines and fees (show other bugs)
Version: Main
Hardware: All All
: P5 - low normal
Assignee: Martin Renvoize (ashimema)
QA Contact: Testopia
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2021-04-17 23:50 UTC by Katrin Fischer
Modified: 2024-08-13 21:19 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

See Also:
Change sponsored?: ---
Patch complexity: ---
Documentation contact:
Documentation submission:
Text to go in the release notes:
Version(s) released in:
Circulation function:


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Katrin Fischer 2021-04-17 23:50:48 UTC
Sorting on the transactions table on the point of sales register details page doesn't appear to work correctly.

- Make some transactions in the points of sale page
- Go to the register details page
- Try to sort on the different columns
- Only the price column will (partially?) sort
- There is also sorting on the Actions columun
Comment 1 Martin Renvoize (ashimema) 2021-04-21 07:37:47 UTC
Aside from the mistaken addition of allowing sorting on action, I believe the sorting is working as expected.. we're using rowGrouping to group transactions.. the sorting is working inside the groups as far as I can tell.

What I have noticed however, is that the css for header highlighting of the rowgroup is getting overridden in some cases by local css..
Comment 2 Martin Renvoize (ashimema) 2021-04-21 13:04:30 UTC
Hmm.. actually there is more funky stuff going on here.. right now only one field appears to sort as I would expect.
Comment 3 Barbara Johnson 2023-07-20 16:59:14 UTC
We are just now testing the POS system.  None of the columns for transaction history are sorting for us. It would be helpful to us to sort by the transaction date as well as by the description of the items sold. It would be great if we could revisit this issue.