Bug 28285 - Lists sorted by copyrightdate display results in ascending date order
Summary: Lists sorted by copyrightdate display results in ascending date order
Status: NEW
Alias: None
Product: Koha
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Lists (show other bugs)
Version: Main
Hardware: All All
: P5 - low trivial
Assignee: Bugs List
QA Contact: Testopia
URL:
Keywords:
: 19764 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2021-05-04 13:36 UTC by Lucy Vaux-Harvey
Modified: 2024-05-24 17:17 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

See Also:
Change sponsored?: ---
Patch complexity: ---
Documentation contact:
Documentation submission:
Text to go in the release notes:
Version(s) released in:
Circulation function:


Attachments
Need an ascending/ descending dropdown (25.87 KB, image/png)
2021-09-14 09:50 UTC, Wasim Rahaman
Details
OPAC view of the same (70.79 KB, image/png)
2021-09-14 09:51 UTC, Wasim Rahaman
Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Lucy Vaux-Harvey 2021-05-04 13:36:15 UTC
If you create a list and choose to sort by copyrightdate the list results will display on both staff interface and opac in ascending date order (oldest first).  It would be useful to be able to choose ascending or descending as the default as often libraries will want the newest items to appear first.
Comment 1 Wasim Rahaman 2021-09-14 09:50:40 UTC
Created attachment 124860 [details]
Need an ascending/ descending dropdown

While creating a new list from the staff client or OPAC there's no mode of sorting ascending/ descending order of the records added to the list. Can we have a dropdown of the same, please?
Comment 2 Wasim Rahaman 2021-09-14 09:51:22 UTC
Created attachment 124861 [details]
OPAC view of the same

While creating a new list from the staff client or OPAC there's no mode of sorting ascending/ descending order of the records added to the list. Can we have a dropdown of the same, please?
Comment 3 Noémie Labine 2024-04-25 14:42:32 UTC
+1
Comment 4 Noémie Labine 2024-04-25 14:43:52 UTC
*** Bug 19764 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***