The references added in bug 21158 are path references from a git/dev installation. Most production installations are probably from packages or source installs which will have a path like "../bin/cronjobs/<script>" where they're relative to the application root/installation base. At the moment they say "misc/cronjobs/<script>".
Should we just remove the "misc" bit for now leaving it at .../cronjobs/<script>? I could do that.
(In reply to Katrin Fischer from comment #1) > Should we just remove the "misc" bit for now leaving it at > .../cronjobs/<script>? I could do that. That could work. I don't love including file paths at all as I think they detract from the UX but better than nothing?