If you look in /usr/share/doc/koha-common, you'll only see release notes for Koha 3.x It looks like it's because of the following line in the debian/ packaging instructions: debian/koha-common.docs:misc/release_notes/release_notes_3*.txt
Could someone check on a package installation if this is still true?
(In reply to Katrin Fischer from comment #1) > Could someone check on a package installation if this is still true? I realize this bug is much newer than bug 7750 which mentioned it for the first time.
(In reply to Katrin Fischer from comment #1) > Could someone check on a package installation if this is still true? 100% still true for on a 22.11 install. They're totally missing from koha-testing-docker but that looks unrelated. dpkg -L koha-common | less /usr/share/doc/koha-common/release_notes_30000.txt.gz /usr/share/doc/koha-common/release_notes_30000alpha.txt.gz /usr/share/doc/koha-common/release_notes_30000beta.txt.gz /usr/share/doc/koha-common/release_notes_30000stableRC1.txt.gz /usr/share/doc/koha-common/release_notes_30001.txt.gz /usr/share/doc/koha-common/release_notes_30002.txt.gz /usr/share/doc/koha-common/release_notes_30003.txt.gz /usr/share/doc/koha-common/release_notes_30004.txt.gz /usr/share/doc/koha-common/release_notes_30005.txt.gz /usr/share/doc/koha-common/release_notes_3_10_0.txt.gz /usr/share/doc/koha-common/release_notes_3_12_0.txt.gz /usr/share/doc/koha-common/release_notes_3_14_0.txt.gz /usr/share/doc/koha-common/release_notes_3_16_0.txt.gz /usr/share/doc/koha-common/release_notes_3_18_0.txt.gz /usr/share/doc/koha-common/release_notes_3_20_0.txt.gz /usr/share/doc/koha-common/release_notes_3_22_0.txt.gz /usr/share/doc/koha-common/release_notes_3_2_0.txt.gz /usr/share/doc/koha-common/release_notes_3_4_0.txt.gz /usr/share/doc/koha-common/release_notes_3_6_0.txt.gz /usr/share/doc/koha-common/release_notes_3_8_0.txt.gz The reason is the following: grep -R "release_notes" debian/* debian/koha-common.docs:misc/release_notes/release_notes_3*.txt debian/koha-core.docs:misc/release_notes/release_notes_3*.txt
It would be an easy fix. It's just super low on the priority list.
In misc/release_notes it looks like we actually have release notes going back to 2.0 as well. I don't know if we want to include those going forward, or if we just stay with 3.* and then add the *.html and *.md release notes...
I think it would make sense to fix this - currently the packages don't contain the release notes of the most current versions, which certainly should be included.
(In reply to Katrin Fischer from comment #6) > I think it would make sense to fix this - currently the packages don't > contain the release notes of the most current versions, which certainly > should be included. Yay! I think the question is... do we want to include all the release notes? Or just 3.x and onwards? There's probably no harm in including all of theM?
(In reply to David Cook from comment #7) > (In reply to Katrin Fischer from comment #6) > > I think it would make sense to fix this - currently the packages don't > > contain the release notes of the most current versions, which certainly > > should be included. > > Yay! > > I think the question is... do we want to include all the release notes? Or > just 3.x and onwards? There's probably no harm in including all of theM? I would assume the same.