Bug 35089 - Background worker: Should prefetch-count be activemq.prefetchSize ?
Summary: Background worker: Should prefetch-count be activemq.prefetchSize ?
Status: CLOSED INVALID
Alias: None
Product: Koha
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Architecture, internals, and plumbing (show other bugs)
Version: Main
Hardware: All All
: P5 - low enhancement
Assignee: Bugs List
QA Contact: Testopia
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on: 32481
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2023-10-18 13:33 UTC by Marcel de Rooy
Modified: 2023-10-18 14:54 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Change sponsored?: ---
Patch complexity: ---
Documentation contact:
Documentation submission:
Text to go in the release notes:
Version(s) released in:
Circulation function:


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Marcel de Rooy 2023-10-18 13:33:18 UTC
From IRC:
marcelr: Joubu: Should prefetch-count be activemq.prefetchSize in worker script?  See https://metacpan.org/pod/Net::Stomp versus https://www.rabbitmq.com/stomp.html

It seems that we should use the CPAN name instead of the Stomp plugin directive?
Comment 1 Jonathan Druart 2023-10-18 13:56:29 UTC
We are using RabbitMQ, not ActiveMQ, so I guess it makes sense to use Rabbit's header ;)
Comment 2 Marcel de Rooy 2023-10-18 14:54:05 UTC
(In reply to Jonathan Druart from comment #1)
> We are using RabbitMQ, not ActiveMQ, so I guess it makes sense to use
> Rabbit's header ;)

Yeah that sounds quite reasonable :)