This arises from Bug 35840. Scenario: Checking out an item to the stats patron that is already checked out to someone else. Should this be counted as return and a localuse in the statistics table, or should it only record a return. OR should it be configurable per system?
To me, use of a statistical patron implies that one is fairly certain that a local use should be recorded, so we should record both a local use and a return if an item is scanned to a statistical patron while previously checked out to another patron.
(In reply to Andrew Fuerste-Henry from comment #1) > To me, use of a statistical patron implies that one is fairly certain that a > local use should be recorded, so we should record both a local use and a > return if an item is scanned to a statistical patron while previously > checked out to another patron. Andrew, thanks! I think we can just call this one RESOLVED INVALID.