bug 32782 introduced a mapping for UNIMARC records imported as a list into ERM This line is problematic for 2 reasons + my $publication_type = $label_pos67 eq 'am' ? 'monograph' : $label_pos67 eq 'as' ? 'serial' : ''; - the position 6 for electronic resource is "l", and not "a", but the habits of libraries and data providers are not always consistent - "monograph" and "serial" are not defined in the authorized value for publication type (ERM_TITLE_PUBLICATION_TYPE) I propose - to take only into account the 7th position of the label (m for ebooks, s for serial) - to use standard values defined in the authorized value : "ebook" and "journal" (or to add "monograph" and "serial" in that AV, but that seems redundant)