Not sure if it is a bug or not, but I don't understand the purpose of importing records of "print" documents (without a link in 856) into ERM Currently Koha imports them but the field "coverage_depth" takes the value "print" Is it useful for some workflows ? Perhaps those records should better not be taken into account if they are present in the list ?
(In reply to Mathieu Saby from comment #0) > Not sure if it is a bug or not, but I don't understand the purpose of > importing records of "print" documents (without a link in 856) into ERM > Currently Koha imports them but the field "coverage_depth" takes the value > "print" > > Is it useful for some workflows ? > Perhaps those records should better not be taken into account if they are > present in the list ? Hi, Can you explain this a bit further? Do you mean you don't understand why we create MARC catalogue records for KBART items? In 24.11 it is now optional whether you create bib records or not (it's a checkbox). If you choose "Y" there is limited logic behind what is created but some libraries like to store a basic catalogue record of databases, ebooks etc. they hold in the catalogue. Have I understood that correctly?
My ticket may have been premature, I'm testing the whole ERM module to present it to colleagues, but I don't yet have the full picture. We'll comment again if necessary...