For UNIMARC, citations often have no publisher information. The publication information can also be in 214 field, it can still be in 210 field but this will become obsolete at some point. The cite function should look into 214 field for publisher information and if there is none, then look into 210).
Yes, both fields should be checked, with priority for 214
Created attachment 182455 [details] [review] Bug 39902: Cite also look for publisher in 214 in Unimarc In UNIMARC, publisher information can be in 214 and in 210. The code was only looking in 210. This patch add support for 214 field. To test: 0. Make sure your instance is in Unimarc 1. Find or create a record with publisher information in 214 (and none in 210) 2. Search for that record in your OPAC 3. Click on the "Cite" button 4. Check that no publisher information appear 5. Apply the patch 6. Repeat step 2 and 3 7. Check that publisher information is now shown
Created attachment 182464 [details] [review] Bug 39902: Cite also look for publisher in 214 in Unimarc In UNIMARC, publisher information can be in 214 and in 210. The code was only looking in 210. This patch add support for 214 field. To test: 0. Make sure your instance is in Unimarc 1. Find or create a record with publisher information in 214 (and none in 210) 2. Search for that record in your OPAC 3. Click on the "Cite" button 4. Check that no publisher information appear 5. Apply the patch 6. Repeat step 2 and 3 7. Check that publisher information is now shown Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>