Bug 40397 - Should paid for be reflected by a credit/refund/write off?
Summary: Should paid for be reflected by a credit/refund/write off?
Status: NEW
Alias: None
Product: Koha
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Fines and fees (show other bugs)
Version: Main
Hardware: All All
: P5 - low normal
Assignee: Bugs List
QA Contact: Testopia
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2025-07-15 15:36 UTC by Christopher Brannon
Modified: 2025-07-15 15:36 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
GIT URL:
Change sponsored?: ---
Patch complexity: ---
Documentation contact:
Documentation submission:
Text to go in the release notes:
Version(s) released in:
Circulation function:


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Christopher Brannon 2025-07-15 15:36:35 UTC
When an item is lost and the patron is charged, and then the item is returned, a refund or credit is issued and the charge removed.  That item then shows as paid for in the record.  Should this be the case?  What is particularly confusing is if this item is lost again and charged for.  The record will show paid for. 

Should the conditions for this paid for status in the item record be refined so that it does not mislead staff into thinking it is paid for when in fact it is not?