Bug 23003

Summary: Accessibility improvements
Product: Koha Reporter: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart>
Component: OPACAssignee: Owen Leonard <oleonard>
Status: NEW --- QA Contact: Testopia <testopia>
Severity: enhancement    
Priority: P5 - low CC: claire.hernandez, david, katrin.fischer, magnus, paul.poulain
Version: unspecifiedKeywords: Academy, accessibility
Hardware: All   
OS: All   
Change sponsored?: --- Patch complexity: ---
Documentation contact: Documentation submission:
Text to go in the release notes:
Version(s) released in:
Bug Depends on: 25150, 25153, 25241, 25243, 25983, 26038, 26040, 27438, 33766, 33886, 34543, 34555, 34556, 25166, 25234, 26926, 27496, 28469, 33764, 33765, 33808, 34542    
Bug Blocks:    

Description Jonathan Druart 2019-05-28 23:44:22 UTC
From the french mailing list:
The Ministry of Culture published a study detailing the accessibility of different OPAC in France.

There are some areas that we could improve.

Koha gets a quite good score, but a 'C' is given for:
1. the "skip links" - https://www.wikiwand.com/en/Skip_link
2. No search autocomplete
3. Button to place a hold on

Also they pointed out that Tanaguru gives Koha a score of 65%, we could certainly improve it. https://www.tanaguru.com/en/open-source-tools-tanaguru/

Important note: The tests have been done using the following catalogue: http://cat-bib.nimes.fr/ (Koha 17.11.13)


http://www.culture.gouv.fr/Thematiques/Livre-et-Lecture/Actualites/Barometre-de-l-accessibilite-numerique-en-lecture-publique-2019-publication-des-resultats-de-la-3e-edition

http://www.culture.gouv.fr/content/download/213998/2245555/version/2/file/Barom%C3%A8tre_accessibilit%C3%A9_num_DGMIC%202019_volet_2.pdf
Comment 1 Paul Poulain 2019-05-31 09:30:15 UTC
note: the tests have also been done on a demo sandbox (UNIMARC), setup by BibLibre for the tests. we've been contacted by the company who made the tests.