Bug 11582 - Have same display/hidden options for authority subfields like bibliographic subfields
Summary: Have same display/hidden options for authority subfields like bibliographic s...
Status: NEW
Alias: None
Product: Koha
Classification: Unclassified
Component: MARC Authority data support (show other bugs)
Version: Main
Hardware: All All
: P5 - low enhancement
Assignee: Galen Charlton
QA Contact: Testopia
URL:
Keywords:
: 12284 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2014-01-17 16:47 UTC by Marjorie Barry-Vila
Modified: 2024-12-13 18:52 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

See Also:
Change sponsored?: ---
Patch complexity: ---
Documentation contact:
Documentation submission:
Text to go in the release notes:
Version(s) released in:
Circulation function:


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Marjorie Barry-Vila 2014-01-17 16:47:35 UTC
Hi,

In 3.12, in advanced constraints of a bibliographic framework, we have now 5 choices for the visibility of the subfields.
Is that we could have the same for authority types? 
Actually, there is 2 choice, hide or show all.

Thanks,

Marjorie
Comment 1 Katrin Fischer 2020-01-05 14:17:57 UTC
*** Bug 12284 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 2 Koha collecto 2024-05-10 19:18:34 UTC
+1
Comment 3 Juliet Heltibridle 2024-12-06 17:02:49 UTC
We would like to see this improvement to the authority types as well. At the moment, if you add a new authority record, only the mandatory fields are uncollapsed. If we were to add the same visibility options that are part of the marc frameworks, that would greatly help when creating new authorities.
Comment 4 Pablo AB 2024-12-13 18:52:29 UTC
What is the criteria to set this as low enhancement?

The manual says auth fw are just like biblio fw, doesn't mention this limitation. We should file another bug for this?

Some libraries manage important metadata which shouldn't be visible, for privacy reasons.