Bug 1884 - Managing Suggestions - way to archive/clean up approved/rejected orders
Summary: Managing Suggestions - way to archive/clean up approved/rejected orders
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 22784
Alias: None
Product: Koha
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Acquisitions (show other bugs)
Version: Main
Hardware: Macintosh All
: P3 enhancement (vote)
Assignee: Bugs List
QA Contact: Bugs List
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on: 5944
Blocks: 1888
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2008-02-25 04:05 UTC by Nicole C. Engard
Modified: 2019-05-04 15:45 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

See Also:
Change sponsored?: ---
Patch complexity: ---
Documentation contact:
Documentation submission:
Text to go in the release notes:
Version(s) released in:


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Chris Cormack 2010-05-21 00:35:44 UTC


---- Reported by nengard@gmail.com 2008-02-25 16:05:47 ----

Since there are lists kept for approved and rejected requests, it makes sense to have a way for librarians to archive these lists of items on some sort of time schedule, or other schedule that works for them.  This is particularly important if you have many requests throughout the year and have very long lists of approves/rejected suggestions.



--- Bug imported by chris@bigballofwax.co.nz 2010-05-21 00:35 UTC  ---

This bug was previously known as _bug_ 1884 at http://bugs.koha.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=1884

Actual time not defined. Setting to 0.0
CC member bchurch@ptfs.com does not have an account here

Comment 1 Katrin Fischer 2011-08-15 06:13:12 UTC
There is a new cronjob to purge/delete old suggestions older than X days in current master:

Bug 5944:
http://git.koha-community.org/gitweb/?p=koha.git;a=commit;h=f7190f48aad671485bcf8a535bf7e48f493d8c22

Looking at the code it seems that it's not checking for the status of the suggestion and it's only deleting, not archiving. 

Leaving this bug open.
Comment 2 Katrin Fischer 2018-06-10 11:30:06 UTC
Still valid.
Comment 3 Katrin Fischer 2019-05-04 15:45:10 UTC
Choosing the newer bug in this case as it has a nice description of feature parts.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 22784 ***