Bug 23069 - More pratical order for columns on the cataloging board
Summary: More pratical order for columns on the cataloging board
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 9594
Alias: None
Product: Koha
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Cataloging (show other bugs)
Version: master
Hardware: All All
: P5 - low enhancement (vote)
Assignee: Bugs List
QA Contact: Testopia
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2019-06-06 19:31 UTC by Alexandre
Modified: 2019-08-18 21:07 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

See Also:
Change sponsored?: ---
Patch complexity: ---
Documentation contact:
Documentation submission:
Text to go in the release notes:
Version(s) released in:


Attachments
item display in cataloging (327.11 KB, image/jpeg)
2019-06-06 19:31 UTC, Alexandre
Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Alexandre 2019-06-06 19:31:59 UTC
Created attachment 90394 [details]
item display in cataloging

Hi,

Some librarians are asking if can change the order of columns when we are modifying item in cataloging.

More precisely, the problem is the "material" column is far from the "copy number" column. This can be confusing when we are in batch items modification.

I let an image which is in french.
(Material is "Matériel désigné" and copy number is "Numéro d'exemplaire".)

Thanks you,

Alexandre
Comment 1 Katrin Fischer 2019-07-13 08:04:56 UTC
Alexandre, can you be a bit more specific on which page you want the sequence to be configurable? Batch item edit or editing items?
Comment 2 Marjorie Barry-Vila 2019-07-16 15:55:46 UTC
(In reply to Katrin Fischer from comment #1)
> Alexandre, can you be a bit more specific on which page you want the
> sequence to be configurable? Batch item edit or editing items?

Hi Katrin,
Alexander is no longer working for Koha now.
I answer for him.
We want the sequence to be configurable especially for editing items.

Regards,
Marjorie
Comment 3 Katrin Fischer 2019-08-18 21:07:05 UTC
Hi Marjorie, thx for clarifying. There is an old bug report for that, marking duplicate with bug 9594.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 9594 ***