According to the notes on bug 20726 the acquisition details for subscriptions should sort by status (open/pending) first and then by ordernumber. The first appears to work, but the second doesn't. Looking at the subscription details of a record with all status being 'complete' the secondary sorting doesn't appear to work. In the column order number, we see: 1683 948 2095 So it doesn't appear to sort alphabetically either. In the column basket we have 2... (603) B... (328) 2... (774) So neither works.
I'm guessing a regression or intended changed from "Bug 21467: Add treetable to subscription detail to group orders by parent ordernumber"
You are probably right, Joonas, but I wonder how we could improve sorting again. Right now I can not see any type of sorting, if all the status are 'complete'. Some kind of chronologically sorting would be nice - maybe by order date?