Bug 8327 - group item types together
Summary: group item types together
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 6685
Alias: None
Product: Koha
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Cataloging (show other bugs)
Version: Main
Hardware: All All
: P5 - low enhancement (vote)
Assignee: Galen Charlton
QA Contact:
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2012-06-27 19:44 UTC by Nicole C. Engard
Modified: 2013-05-08 17:07 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
Change sponsored?: ---
Patch complexity: ---
Documentation contact:
Documentation submission:
Text to go in the release notes:
Version(s) released in:


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Nicole C. Engard 2012-06-27 19:44:15 UTC
I would love to see the ability to add another layer to item types, maybe
called item group. So, say you have DVD, CD, Music, etc, these things could
live under the umbrella of an Item Group called maybe Audiovisual. This would
enable us to put circulation rules on a group that would affect all items in
the group, which would be more congruous with the kinds of policies that
libraries tend to have.

For instance, our policy on A/V materials is that a patron may only have 5 at a
time. However, in the Circ & Fine rules, the only way we could address this was
by give all of our A/V types a limit of 5 and then we have to be paying
attention to each account to be sure that someone isn't taking out 5 DVD's and
then 5 CD's. If there were an additional layer that could group them together,
it could serve as a way to apply a limit on the whole group of item types.
Comment 1 Katrin Fischer 2012-06-27 20:02:48 UTC
I am not sure adding another level of complexity to the circulation rules would work out very well - we already have to fix lots of stuff in there :)

I think maybe the itemtypes could be used differently? If you make the "itemtype" what determines your circulation rule, in your example "Audiovisual" and maybe use the collection code to differentiate between different types of audiovisuals?
Comment 2 Nicole C. Engard 2013-05-08 17:07:21 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 6685 ***